A systematic review and a meta-analysis on the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries during vaginal delivery.

AIM: The incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) has increased in the past two decades despite improved awareness of the risk factors. This study aimed to define the incidence of OASIS in women with different features (instrumental delivery or other variables). METHODS: A systematic review was conducted on articles reporting the incidence of OASIS. This review aims to examine the association of instrumentation and OASIS by performing a formal systematic review of the published literature. Databases used for the research were MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and 'Maternity and infant care' databases. RESULTS: Two independent reviewers screened the selected articles. 2326 duplicates were removed from the total of 4907 articles. The remaining 2581 articles were screened for title and abstract. 1913 articles were excluded due to irrelevance. The remaining 300 were screened as full text. Primiparity associated with the use of forceps were the features associated with the highest incidence of OASIS in the selected articles (19.4%). OASIS in all women had an overall incidence of 3.8%. The incidence of OASIS in all women by geographical region was the highest (6.5%) in North America. CONCLUSIONS: There are various factors that impact on the incidence of OASIS and the combination of some of these, such as the use of forceps in primiparas, resulted in the highest incidence of OASIS. The lack of international consensus is limiting the improvements that can be done to reduce OASIS rates and improve best clinical practice.

Revisional ileoanal pouch surgery: a systematic literature review assessing outcomes over the last 40 years.

AIM: Failure of primary ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) occurs in up to 15% of patients. Revision surgery may be offered to patients wishing to maintain gastrointestinal continuity. This paper explores the literature relating to IPAA revision surgery, focusing on pouch function after revision and factors associated with pouch failure. METHODS: Search of PubMed database was carried out for 'ileal pouch anal anastomoses', 'ileoanal pouch', 'restorative proctocolectomy', 'revision surgery', 'redo surgery', 'failure', 'refashion surgery', 'reconstruction surgery' and 'salvage surgery'. Papers were screened using the PRISMA literature review strategy. Studies of adults published after 1980 in English with an available abstract were included. Case reports and studies that were superseded using the same data were excluded. RESULTS: Nineteen papers (1424 patients) were identified. Bowel motion frequency doubled following revision surgery compared to primary IPAA although the increase was not always statistically significant. In patients failing primary IPAA, frequency of daytime bowel motions improved following revision in three studies but only reached significance in one (12.1 vs. 6.9, P = 0.021). Risk of pouch failure is increased in patients who develop pelvic sepsis after the primary procedure with the largest study demonstrating a four-fold increased risk (hazard ratio 3.691, P < 0.0001). A final diagnosis of Crohn's causes a four-fold increased risk of pouch failure (n = 81; OR 3.92, 95% CI 1.1-15.9, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing revisional surgery, improved outcomes are observed but are inferior compared to primary IPAA patients. Pelvic sepsis after primary IPAA and a final diagnosis of Crohn's are associated with increased risk of pouch failure.

Heated IntraPEritoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) for Patients With Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in surgical oncology, most patients with primary ovarian cancer develop a recurrence that is associated with a poor prognosis. The aim of this review was to establish the impact of Heated IntraPEritoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the overall survival of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS: A search of PubMed/MEDLINE databases was performed in February 2015 using the terms "recurrent ovarian cancer," "cytoreductive surgery/cytoreduction," and "heated/hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy." Only English articles with available abstracts assessing the impact of HIPEC in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer were examined. The primary outcome measure was overall survival, whereas secondary outcomes included disease-free survival and HIPEC-related morbidity. RESULTS: Sixteen studies with 1168 patients were analyzed. Most studies were Level IV, with 4 studies graded as Level III and 1 Level II. Cisplatin was the main chemotherapeutic agent used, but variations were observed in the actual technique, temperature of perfusate, and duration of treatment. In patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC, the overall survival ranged between 26.7 and 35 months, with disease-free survival varying between 8.5 and 48 months. Heated IntraPEritoneal Chemotherapy seems to confer survival benefits to patients with recurrent disease, with a randomized controlled study reporting that the overall survival is doubled when cytoreductive surgery is compared with cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy (13. 4 vs 26.7 months). Heated IntraPEritoneal Chemotherapy-related morbidity ranged between 13.6% and 100%, but it was mainly minor and not significantly different from that experienced by patients who only underwent cytoreduction. CONCLUSIONS: Cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC seem to be associated with promising results in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. Large international prospective studies are required to further quantify the true efficacy of HIPEC and identify the optimal treatment protocol for a maximum survival benefit.

The diagnostic yield of preoperative staging computed tomography of the thorax in colorectal cancer patients without hepatic metastases.

BACKGROUND: National UK guidelines recommend preoperative computed tomography (CT) examination of the chest for all patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) as identification of thoracic metastatic disease may influence treatment plans. The diagnostic yield of this approach for patients without radiological evidence of hepatic metastases remains unclear. The aim of this study was to establish the impact upon treatment of chest CT examination for CRC patients without metastatic liver disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients diagnosed with CRC without liver metastases disease between December 2006 and December 2013 in a single institution were identified from a prospectively recorded departmental database. Data collected included patient demographics, disease stage and chest CT findings. RESULTS: There were 358 CRC patients (183 male, 175 female, median age 70 years, range 24-96 years) without liver metastases. Colon cancer accounted for 68% of cases with 32% of patients diagnosed with rectal cancer. The majority of patients (n=292, 81.6%) had no evidence of thoracic pathology during the study period. Lung metastases were identified in five (1.4%) patients, one of them subsequently diagnosed with benign pulmonary nodule. In 61 (17.0%) patients the lung nodules were classified as intermediate with only three subsequently reclassified as pulmonary metastases (n=1) or primary lung cancer (n=2). CONCLUSION: In the absence of liver metastases, CRC rarely spreads to the lung. Consequently, preoperative chest CT examination for patients without evidence of liver metastases may not be necessary in the majority of patients. Future studies are required to identify patients at high risk for pulmonary metastases who may benefit from this preoperative investigation.

Prospective clinical audit of two neuromodulatory treatments for fecal incontinence: sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS).

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Two types of neuromodulation are currently practised for the treatment of fecal incontinence (FI): sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS). This study compares these therapies, as no data exist to prospectively assess their relative efficacy and costs. METHODS: The subjects of this study were two distinct cohorts undergoing SNS (between 2003 and 2008) or PTNS (2008-onwards) for FI. Clinical outcomes assessed at 3 months included incontinence scores and the number of weekly incontinence episodes. The direct medical costs for each procedure were calculated from the audited expenditure of our unit. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients (94.6 % women) underwent permanent SNS and 146 (87.7 % women) underwent PTNS. The mean pre-treatment incontinence score (± SD) was greater in the SNS cohort (14 ± 4 vs. 12 ± 4) and the mean post-treatment incontinence scores were similar for the two therapies (9 ± 5 vs. 10 ± 4), with a greater effect size evident in the SNS patients. In a 'pseudo case-control' analysis with 37 "matched" patients, the effect of both treatments was similar. The cost of treating a patient for 1 year was £ 11,374 ($ 18,223) for permanent SNS vs. £ 1740 ($ 2784) for PTNS. CONCLUSION: Given the lesser cost and invasive nature of PTNS, where both techniques are available, a trial of PTNS could be considered for all patients.

Electrically stimulated gracilis neosphincter for end-stage fecal incontinence: the long-term outcome.

BACKGROUND: Electrically stimulated gracilis neosphincter is an established treatment for patients with end-stage fecal incontinence. Few data, however, describe its long-term efficacy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the long-term functional outcome associated with this procedure. DESIGN: Patients who underwent gracilis neosphincter construction between1989 and 2001 were identified from a prospectively recorded database. Demographics and pretreatment anorectal physiologic data were available for all patients. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at an academic colorectal unit in a tertiary center. PATIENTS: Sixty patients (median age, 42 years; 46 females) with fecal incontinence and a Williams continence score ≥5 were recruited to the study. The causes of incontinence included obstetric injury (n = 22), anal surgery (n = 17), atresia (n = 7), idiopathic incontinence (n = 6), anorectal excision (n = 4), and ileoanal pouch incontinence (n = 4). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcomes measured were the Williams continence score and the proportion of patients with a Williams score ≤3 who avoided permanent stoma formation. RESULTS: Continence improved for the cohort postoperatively at 2 years (2(2-5); p < 0.001) but no significant difference was found between continence scores preoperatively and at 13 years (5(3-6); p = not significant). However, a sustained improvement at 13 years was noted for patients in the anal surgery (3(2-5);p < 0.001) and obstetric injury groups (4.5(3-6); p = 0.001). Twenty-six patients (43%) had a Williams score ≤3 and avoided permanent stoma after 13 years. Eighteen patients developed postoperative rectal evacuatory disorder; 10 of them required a conduit to facilitate colonic irrigation. Postoperative evacuatory disorder was more frequent in patients with a history of obstetric injury (p = 0.008). LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by the lack of bowel diaries and quality-of-life scores. CONCLUSION: Gracilis neosphincter is associated with clinically significant and sustained symptom improvement in patients with end-stage fecal incontinence secondary to obstetric injury or anal surgery. These data support the continued use of this procedure in highly selected patients.

Symptom distribution and anorectal physiology results in male patients with rectal intussusception and prolapse.

BACKGROUND: Rectal intussusception and external rectal prolapse are uncommon proctographic findings in men reflecting the lack of studies investigating such patients. The aim of this study was to identify the demographic, clinical, and physiological characteristics of this population with a view to appreciate the mechanism of development of this condition. METHODS: All men, presenting with symptoms of constipation or fecal incontinence, who were diagnosed proctographically with recto-rectal intussusception (RRI)/recto-anal intussusception (RAI) or external rectal prolapse (ERP) between 1994 and 2007 at a tertiary academic colorectal unit were studied. Demographics, relevant comorbidities, distribution and symptom duration, and anorectal physiology results were analyzed retrospectively for each proctographic group and intergroup comparisons performed. RESULTS: Two hundred five men (median age 50 y; range, 13-86) including 155 (75.6%) without any relevant comorbidities were studied. A significant proportion of patients in all proctographic groups reported rectal evacuatory difficulty ([RRI, 46.4%], [RAI, 39.4%], [ERP, 44.8%]; P = 0.38,analysis of variance). Patients also reported a combination of fecal incontinence symptoms (e.g., urge, passive, postdefecatory leakage) that did not differ across the proctographic groups. Anorectal physiological parameters were within normal range and were not found to be statistically different between the proctographic groups with the exception of anal resting pressure, which was lowest in ERP patients (62 cm H2O; range, 14-155) compared with patients with RRI (89 cm H2O; range, 16-250; P = 0.003) and RAI (92 cm H2O; range, 38-175; P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Men with rectal intussusception and prolapse present with a combination of symptoms, predominantly defective rectal evacuation. Anorectal physiological assessment has failed to shed light into the mechanism of development of this condition and thus, the need for large observational studies incorporating integrated defecographic and manometric assessments of the evacuation process.

Outcome of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) for fecal incontinence: a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the long-term efficacy of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) in fecal incontinence (FI). BACKGROUND: There is extensive evidence regarding the efficacy of PTNS in urinary incontinence. Data on the efficacy of PTNS for FI are limited to a few small case series with relatively short-follow up. METHODS: A prospective cohort of patients with FI was studied. Incontinence scores were measured using a validated questionnaire (Cleveland Clinic Florida-FI score) at specific time points: before treatment, after completion of a treatment course (12 PTNS sessions), and before the last maintenance ("top-up") therapy. Deferment time and average number of weekly incontinence episodes were also estimated from a prospective bowel dairy kept by the patient at these time points. Quality of life was assessed with the Rockwood Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 150 patients were recruited to the study between January 2008 and June 2012. Analysis was performed on 115 patients who continued to receive PTNS after a median follow-up of 26 (range, 12-42) months. The baseline Cleveland Clinic Florida-FI score ±SD (12.0 ± 3.9) improved after 12 PTNS sessions (9.4 ± 4.6, P < 0.0001) and after "top-up" treatments (10.0 ± 4.3, P < 0.0001). The increase in the Cleveland Clinic Florida-FI score between the end of the 12th session and the last "top-up" therapy was also significant (P = 0.04). A similar pattern was seen for the deferment time and the quality of life scores. The median time between "top-up" sessions was 12 months (range, 1-40 months), significantly longer than the recommended interval of 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: PTNS is a well-tolerated treatment with high acceptability in the majority of patients. It provides a sustained improvement in FI up to 42 months in a relatively noninvasive manner. The effect of PTNS diminishes with time and additional therapy sessions at 6 monthly intervals may result in greater improvements. PTNS ought to be considered as the first step in all patients with FI refractory to maximum conservative therapies.

Establishing a regional enterocutaneous fistula service: the Royal London hospital experience.

BACKGROUND: The development of enterocutaneous fistula (ECF) is one of the most challenging complications encountered in colorectal surgery. Currently, only two supra-regional centres are nationally designated in the United Kingdom to treat ECF patients. The aim of this study was to assess clinical outcome measures following the implementation of an ECF service at The Royal London Hospital. METHODS: All patients diagnosed with enterocutaneous fistula between December 2005 and November 2011 were recruited to the study. Clinical outcomes analysed included successful ECF closure, number of surgical procedures required for successful ECF closure, re-fistulation rates and morbidity/mortality data. RESULTS: 41 patients (20 M:21 F) of median age 54 years (range, 16-81) were studied. Patients had undergone a median of 4 (range, 1-18) operations prior to referral. Eleven fistulas (27%) healed spontaneously. Of the remaining 30 patients, 5 (17%) died before surgery due to uncontrollable sepsis and 6 (20%) refused surgical intervention and were managed conservatively. Nineteen patients (63%) underwent definitive surgical repair requiring a median of 1 (range, 1-2) operations, with recurrent fistulation reported in 4 patients (21%). No intra-operative mortality was encountered. Two (11%) patients died postoperatively due to cardio-respiratory complications. CONCLUSIONS: These data compare favourably with outcome measures reported by designated national centres, suggesting ECF patients can be safely managed closer to home in regional units that have the appropriate expertise. Nevertheless, management of this condition remains critically dependent upon a dedicated multidisciplinary team approach.

Outcome of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence in patients refractory to percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation and sacral nerve stimulation are both second-line treatments for fecal incontinence, but the comparative efficacy of the 2 therapies is unknown. In our institution, patients with refractory fecal incontinence are generally treated with percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation before being considered for sacral nerve stimulation. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the outcome associated with this treatment algorithm in order to guide future management strategies. DESIGN: All patients with fecal incontinence treated over a 3-year period with tibial nerve stimulation before receiving sacral nerve stimulation were identified from a prospectively recorded database. Demographics and pretreatment anorectal physiological data were available for all patients. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at an academic colorectal unit in a tertiary center. PATIENTS: Twenty patients (17 female:3 male, median age 55 (33-79) years) were identified to be refractory to percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical outcome data were collected prospectively before and after treatment, including 1) Cleveland Clinic Florida-Fecal Incontinence scores and 2) number of incontinence episodes per week. RESULTS: The mean (±SD) pretreatment incontinence score (11.7 ± 3.5) did not differ from the mean incontinence score after 12 sessions of tibial nerve stimulation (10.9 ± 3.6, p = 0.42). All patients were subsequently counseled for sacral nerve stimulation, and 68.4% of them reported a significant therapeutic benefit with an improved incontinence score (7.7 ± 4.1, p = 0.014). LIMITATIONS: This was a nonrandomized study with a relatively small number of patients CONCLUSION: Sacral nerve stimulation appears to be an effective treatment for patients who do not gain an adequate therapeutic benefit from percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation and, thus, should be routinely considered for this patient cohort.

Assessment of female patients with rectal intussusception and prolapse: is this a progressive spectrum of disease?

BACKGROUND: Rectal intussusception may be the initial abnormality of a progressive pelvic floor disorder culminating in external prolapse. The evidence, however, is unclear, and the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying this condition are unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to identify the relationship between age, symptom duration, anorectal physiology parameters, and type of intussusception/prolapse in order to appreciate the natural history of the condition. DESIGN: All female patients diagnosed proctographically with rectorectal/rectoanal intussusception or external prolapse between 1994 and 2007 were studied. Demographics, symptom duration, and anorectal physiology results were compared between these proctographic groups. Patients with repeat proctographic evaluation were also analyzed separately. SETTINGS: This investigation was conducted at a tertiary academic colorectal center. PATIENTS: A total of 1014 women (median age, 51; range, 16-96), including 32 who underwent repeat proctography, were analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were the differences in median age, symptom duration, and anorectal physiology parameters between the proctographic groups. RESULTS: The cohort exhibited a statistically significant difference (p = 0.0001) in the median age of the proctographic groups with older patients diagnosed with rectoanal rather than rectorectal intussusception, which was supported by uni- and multivariate modeling. Symptom duration was statistically different (p = 0.0002) between the rectorectal intussusception (60 months; range, 1-936) and external rectal prolapse patient groups (36 months; range, 2-732). Patients with external rectal prolapse had statistically lower anal resting (median, 41 versus 77 cmH2O) and squeeze pressures (median 40 versus 56 cmH2O) than patients with rectorectal intussusception. Within 2 years, 19.2% and 3.8% of patients with rectorectal intussusception on the initial proctogram demonstrated progression to rectoanal intussusception and external prolapse. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its retrospective nature. CONCLUSION: Rectal intussusception may be an initial abnormality leading to external prolapse, but this appears to happen infrequently. Long-term observational studies are required to fully understand its natural history.

Radiological incidence of parastomal herniation in cancer patients with permanent colostomy: what is the ideal size of the surgical aperture?

BACKGROUND: Parastomal herniation frequently complicates stoma formation. Aperture size has been shown to be an independent predictor of hernia development but there is a paucity of data regarding the ideal stoma diameter. The aim of this study was to establish the radiological incidence of herniation in patients with a permanent colostomy and correlate it with the size of the abdominal wall defect in order to identify an aperture diameter associated with a reduced herniation risk. METHODS: All patients who underwent permanent colostomy formation for colorectal cancer over a five-year period in a single institution were recruited to the study. Patient demographics, operative details and stoma-related symptoms were recorded. Post-operative CT scans were reviewed for evidence of parastomal herniation. The diameter of the abdominal wall defect was measured radiologically. RESULTS: 43 patients (mean age 69 years) were included in the analysis. Radiologically, 25/43 (58%) had evidence of a parastomal hernia. The median aperture diameter was 35 mm (range 25-58 mm) in patients with a parastomal hernia and 22 mm (range 10-36 mm) in patients without herniation (p < 0.0001). There were no cases of herniation with an abdominal wall defect size <25 mm. The median follow up was 26.0 months (range 6-55) in patients with herniation as opposed to 16.0 months (range 7-36) in patients without herniation (p = 0.11). CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with a permanent colostomy develop a parastomal hernia within the first two post-operative years. Parastomal herniation appears unlikely to develop with an abdominal wall defect diameter ≤25 mm provided this does not enlarge with time. Surgical techniques that utilise stapling devices to form a 'custom-made' and rigid trephine might reduce the herniation risk.